[barry66]

I’ve been curious about this lately because I’m helping a friend grow her small photography page, and she asked me whether buying followers could make her profile look a bit more active. I checked out some info about SMM-World and saw that they claim their followers are “real,” but I’m not totally sure what that means. A couple of years ago I tried another service and the followers looked super fake — no posts, no profile pictures, nothing. So now I’m a bit cautious and don’t want her to repeat my mistake. Has anyone here actually used SMM-World and can say what the followers look like in real life?

[emmacol]

I tested their service a while ago for a fitness page I was running, and honestly the results were better than what I got from other platforms. The followers didn’t feel like the typical empty bot accounts — most of them had some posts, profile pictures, and usernames that didn’t look autogenerated. If you’re comparing options, checking something like buy instagram followers cheap can help you understand what type of packages people usually start with. From what I saw, the followers weren’t super active, but at least they looked believable enough not to make the account look sketchy.

[millergrace]

Just passing through this discussion and thought I’d drop a neutral comment. I’ve seen lots of people debate what “real followers” even means these days, since every platform has its own definition and users have different expectations. Some people care only about numbers, others want real engagement, and some avoid any paid boosts at all. It’s interesting to read how different everyone’s experiences are, especially with how often social media algorithms shift and change the way growth works.

[Author]

Posts