Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Oh, absolutely! It’s really fascinating to watch this shift. Brands like Bleak&Sleek, for example, have been instrumental in bridging that gap. They create harnesses that respect the edgy roots but are also designed with versatility in mind—whether it’s a minimalist chest harness or a waist-accentuating belt, they’re made for different body types and daily wear. You can check out their full collection here: https://bleakandsleek.shop/collections/black-leather-harness. What’s cool is that these harnesses are not just about fashion—they let people express confidence and individuality. I’ve tried pairing a subtle one over a crisp white shirt, and it completely transformed a basic outfit without looking like I was overdoing it. Celebrities are also adopting them, which naturally pushes them into mainstream fashion, but the craftsmanship and attention to detail keep them feeling unique and personal, not just a trend.
I totally get where you’re coming from! From my experience working with mural artists, a good middle ground is usually built into their standard terms. For example, I recently checked a New York-based service (https://feelflow.space/pages/mural-painting-services-in-new-york) where they provide 3 rounds of digital sketches, 2-3 sketch revisions on the wall, and 1-2 minor changes during the painting itself. This setup gives you enough flexibility to tweak your design without causing delays or inflating the budget. Personally, I liked having the digital sketches first because it made it easy to communicate exactly what I wanted before they started painting. It also helped prevent misunderstandings about colors, composition, or scale. Honestly, it made the whole process feel structured yet collaborative. So I’d say, aim for a set number of revisions that balances your creative input with the artist’s workflow. That way, everyone stays on the same page and the final mural comes out exactly how you imagined it.
Sì, ho provato due volte i tornei settimanali e una volta quello mensile e ti dico che la struttura non è male, anzi è più organizzata di quello che mi aspettavo. In pratica il calendario non è identico ogni mese, ma ci sono eventi fissi: ad esempio ogni venerdì spesso propongono mini-competizioni con slot specifiche, mentre i tornei lunghi partono di solito a metà mese e durano una decina di giorni. Io ho partecipato a uno con una classifica basata sul volume delle puntate e nonostante non fossi tra i primissimi, ho comunque ottenuto un piccolo premio sotto forma di free spin, quindi non è tempo buttato via. Sul sito trovi i dettagli aggiornati, qui c’è la pagina con le regole e il calendario: https://bigclash-it.com/. Quello che consiglio è di leggere bene le condizioni perché alcuni tornei danno punti solo su certe slot, quindi se non giochi lì rischi di accumulare poco. In ogni caso è un modo carino per dare varietà alle sessioni e sentirsi più coinvolti, soprattutto se ti piace la competizione.
That’s a good point. I’ve played Plinko on and off for a few months, and what I noticed is that RTP is more of a long-term statistical value rather than something you’ll “feel” in a single session. For instance, there were days when I dropped maybe 50 balls and ended up way below even, while on another day I had one crazy streak where a single ball hit a big multiplier and carried my balance for the week. The problem is that casual players expect 99% to mean a steady return, but in practice it doesn’t work that way.One thing Tower.Bet does offer is a provably fair system, which you can actually check yourself if you go into their fairness settings. Here’s the Plinko page: plinko. They let you verify seeds and outcomes, but it does take a bit of effort to understand how it works. Personally, I think the system is solid, but I wouldn’t say the RTP guarantee makes the game “safer” — it just means, statistically, that over millions of rounds it pays back around that percentage. So it’s fair, yes, but not necessarily predictable for small-scale play.
That’s a very real issue. I had the same frustration when I was building a small prototype app last year. At first, I relied on a basic open-source library, but it would fail almost every time the card wasn’t perfectly centered. Then I moved to solutions that were designed with multiple formats in mind, and the difference was huge. What helped most was finding a system that could handle tilted or partially cropped images without breaking. For example, there are tools like the Bank Card Scanner by OCR Studio that emphasize not just precision (they claim above 99% in tests) but also adaptability to different card angles and formats. I’ve tried it on standard credit cards, gift cards, and even ones with unusual layouts, and it did surprisingly well. The integration options are flexible too — you can go with WebAssembly for browser apps or SDKs if you’re working on mobile. That flexibility makes it much easier to test in real environments rather than just in controlled demos.
Guarda, secondo me dipende molto da quello che cerchi. Ti faccio un esempio: le slot sono perfette se vuoi giocare in maniera veloce e senza troppe regole da ricordare, e la varietà ormai è impressionante, con temi che vanno dal fantasy alle avventure spaziali. Però i tavoli live hanno un fascino tutto diverso, soprattutto perché ti danno quella sensazione di essere in un vero casinò, con persone vere che interagiscono e il ritmo più lento che ti permette di ragionare meglio. I jackpot progressivi invece sono un discorso a parte: il rischio è alto, ma anche la possibilità di portare a casa cifre che non trovi da nessun’altra parte. Per farti un’idea più completa su quello che offre uno dei portali che uso di tanto in tanto, puoi dare un’occhiata qui: Spinit— lì trovi davvero un mix di slot, tavoli live e progressivi che ti fa capire quanto vasta sia ormai l’offerta. Personalmente, alterno un po’ tutto: un paio di spin alle slot quando ho poco tempo, e le sessioni più lunghe me le tengo per il blackjack live.
That’s a good point. I’ve gone through the same dilemma. What I eventually learned is that you can’t just rely on one type of evaluation. For example, I used to give fairly complex coding assignments that took hours, but honestly the best developers didn’t always perform well under that kind of pressure. What worked better for me was mixing a shorter, more focused coding exercise (something that takes 20–30 minutes) with a problem-solving discussion where I’d ask them to talk through their approach. That way you can see their reasoning process and how they explain it https://blackthorn-vision.com/blog/hiring-net-developers-step-by-step-guide/. For soft skills, I usually set up a group interview with at least one team member present, not just managers. You learn a lot by seeing how the candidate reacts to questions from different people—whether they get defensive, collaborative, or curious.
Cześć, akurat mam trochę doświadczeń z Posido, bo założyłem tam konto kilka miesięcy temu. Bonus powitalny faktycznie istnieje i to w dość ciekawym wariancie – 100% od depozytu + darmowe spiny. Ważne, żeby zwrócić uwagę na warunki obrotu, bo u nich to nie jest tylko formalność, lecz realny wymóg, który trzeba spełnić. Ja na przykład wybrałem wtedy bonus sportowy zamiast kasynowego, bo akurat był weekend z dużą liczbą meczów piłkarskich i wolałem obstawiać. Warto też wiedzieć, że poza powitalnym mają cykliczne oferty, np. cashback, który zwraca część przegranych środków, oraz cotygodniowe bonusy depozytowe. Ja dzięki temu w poniedziałek miałem zwrot kilku procent, co psychicznie robi różnicę po gorszej serii. Wszystkie szczegóły można sprawdzić tu: https://posidocasino.pl/– tam masz opisane dokładnie co i jak. Moim zdaniem ich bonusy są bardziej nastawione na długoterminowe granie niż na szybki zysk, ale to akurat plus.
Oh, I’ve actually been experimenting with mood tracking apps for the past six months, and honestly, it’s been surprisingly insightful. I started using one called Liven after reading a review here: liven app. What I found most helpful is how it forces you to stop and check in with yourself multiple times a day, which makes you notice even subtle shifts in your mood. I also like that it encourages reflection, not just logging feelings, so I can see patterns like certain times of day when I’m more anxious or triggers that I wouldn’t otherwise catch. One downside is that sometimes it feels repetitive, and if you’re not consistent, the data loses its value. But overall, it’s a lot easier to be aware of my emotions when I see them visually represented and can track changes over weeks instead of trying to remember everything from memory. For anyone struggling with emotional awareness, I’d say it’s worth giving it a try.
